Drilling - ASX:CMM
Lexington hits 6m at 57.38g/t and 7m at 40.01g/t; Orion South 21.83m at 9.54g/t
Capricorn reports September quarter drilling at the Mt Gibson underground prospects: 88 holes (26,668 m) at Lexington and Hornet, and 45 holes (10,575 m) at Orion South. The best intervals are high grade, including 6.0m at 57.38 g/t Au at Lexington and 21.83m at 9.54 g/t Au at Orion South, and they sit below current reserve pit and stope designs. No new resource is stated; a maiden Inferred Lexington underground estimate is expected later this quarter.
(price sensitive) - Capricorn Metals announced: "Further High-Grade Results at Lexington" (61 pages) - read the original
Score
What investors must know
- 88 holes (26,668 m, diamond and RC) were drilled at Lexington and Hornet in the September 2026 quarter, plus 45 holes (10,575 m) at Orion South.
- Lexington's standout intervals are 6.0m at 57.38 g/t Au from 616m and 7.0m at 40.01 g/t Au from 401m, with 29.5m at 6.65 g/t from 760.5m.
- Hornet's 3.0m at 89.88 g/t Au from 120m lies beneath the current reserve pit outline, and 14.5m at 1.44 g/t from 278m is a wider, lower grade interval.
- Orion South returned 21.83m at 9.54 g/t Au from 371m, and drilling now defines more than 1,600m of prospective strike.
- Mineralisation continues below reserve pit and stope designs and is open along strike and at depth, but the release states no new resource or reserve.
- Widths are down-hole only, and the tables mix 1 g/t and 0.5 g/t cut-offs with different internal waste rules, so the intervals are not fully like-for-like.
- Lexington's maiden Inferred underground Mineral Resource Estimate is expected later this quarter, and further assays are expected in Q2 FY27.
The drill intercepts, normalised
Excellent - a genuinely strong hit by any ASX standard.
How this hit compares
Better than 99% of the 322 gold intercepts DrillScore has decoded in the past 12 months.
Among hits starting 400-800 m down-hole - underground: the grade has to pay for the shafts and declines - better than 100% of 74.
Best hit 344 g-m against an average of 219 g-m in the previous 1 drill result (1.6x).
Compare every hit, depth by depth and company by company - depth is down-hole, to the start of the interval.
How every hole did - one block per hole, coloured by its best hit
- Excellent 4
- Really good 6
- Good 7
- Modest 27
- No significant hit 126
17 of 170 holes reached 'good' or better (4 excellent, 6 really good, 7 good); the other 153 were modest, low or nil.
The holes, side by side - schematic, best hole first
Each line is a hole drilled from the surface (top); each block is a reported interval at its down-hole depth, sized by its width and coloured by its rating. The holes are side by side for comparison, not at their real positions, and are drawn only as deep as their deepest reported interval. Hover a block for the numbers; the 32 other holes are in the table below.
Every interval, in numbers
Every interval as metal-metres: width x grade (gram-metres for gold, %-metres for copper). Gold bands are Stockhead's rule of thumb: over 50 good, 100-200 really good, 200-500 excellent, beyond that stellar (and under 10, low). Top share is how much of an interval comes from its richest sub-interval - the smearing check.
| Hole | From | Width | Grade | Metal-metres | Rating | Top share | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMRC2555D | 616m | 6m | 57.4 g/t Au | Excellent | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1 (1 g/t, minimum 1m, 5.5m... | ||
| CMRC3143D | 401m | 7m | 40.0 g/t Au | Excellent | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. Open pit table (0.5 g/t)... | ||
| CMRC2552D | 120m | 3m | 89.9 g/t Au | Excellent | Hornet highlight in text. Appendix 1. Open pit table (0.5 g/t) lists... | ||
| CMRC2635D | 371m | 21.8m | 9.54 g/t Au | Excellent | Orion South highlight in text. Appendix 1b (2m internal waste, the... | ||
| CMRC2612D | 761m | 29.5m | 6.65 g/t Au | Really good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. Open pit table lists 31.29m... | ||
| CMRC3145D | 294m | 3.4m | 56.0 g/t Au | Really good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2648D | 175m | 9m | 18.5 g/t Au | Really good | Not in the text. Figure 5 label gives the same interval. Appendix 1b... | ||
| CMRC2539D | 289m | 6.8m | 20.2 g/t Au | Really good | Orion South. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the same interval. | ||
| CMRC2412D | 501m | 14.5m | 8.44 g/t Au | Really good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2619D | 260m | 41m | 2.65 g/t Au | Really good | Text gives 32.0m at 3.25 g/t from 260m for this hole, which is not in... | ||
| CMRC2538D | 160m | 10.7m | 9.13 g/t Au | Good | Orion South. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the same interval. | ||
| CMRC2412D | 364m | 20m | 4.69 g/t Au | Good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2558D | 518m | 32.5m | 2.64 g/t Au | Good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2537D | 238m | 5.1m | 15.4 g/t Au | Good | Orion South. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the same interval. | ||
| CMRC2622DW1 | 556m | 23.3m | 3.14 g/t Au | Good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2642DW1 | 584m | 34.8m | 2.10 g/t Au | Good | Lexington highlight in text. Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2619D | 242m | 6.4m | 9.21 g/t Au | Good | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2541D | 241m | 4.5m | 13.0 g/t Au | Good | Orion South. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the same interval. | ||
| CMRC2538D | 176m | 1.6m | 32.7 g/t Au | Good | Appendix 1b. Separate interval in the same hole as the 10.74m at 9.13... | ||
| CMRC2536D | 264m | 10m | 5.18 g/t Au | Good | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2587 | 107m | 5m | 9.71 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2630D | 92m | 6m | 8.08 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2536D | 356m | 3m | 15.4 g/t Au | Modest | Orion South highlight in text (3.0m at 15.43 g/t). Appendix 1b. | ||
| CMRC3122 | 170m | 16m | 2.88 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2608D | 489m | 5.0m | 9.18 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2610D | 505m | 28m | 1.60 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2524D | 490m | 10.1m | 4.36 g/t Au | Modest | Orion South highlight in text. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the... | ||
| CMRC2628D | 400m | 18.8m | 2.35 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2540D | 312m | 7.8m | 5.47 g/t Au | Modest | Orion South highlight in text. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the... | ||
| CMRC2622D | 646m | 17.1m | 2.49 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2533D | 422m | 13.5m | 3.10 g/t Au | Modest | Orion South. Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label gives the same interval. | ||
| CMRC2574 | 228m | 11m | 3.46 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2608D | 328m | 10.1m | 3.68 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2622D | 617m | 12.6m | 2.84 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2535D | 66m | 9m | 3.89 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC3143D | 351m | 20.7m | 1.68 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2557D | 842m | 2.6m | 13.5 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. Figure 5 label not checked. | ||
| CMRC2625D | 750m | 2.8m | 12.2 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2535DW1 | 268m | 7.3m | 4.41 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2628D | 364m | 19m | 1.67 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2618D | 64m | 4m | 7.42 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2536DW1 | 260m | 7.9m | 3.60 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b. Figure 5 label shows 7.90m at 3.60 g/t from 260.43m... | ||
| CMRC2553D | 319m | 12.2m | 2.33 g/t Au | Modest | 50% | Hornet highlight in text (CMRC2553D). Appendix 1. | |
| CMRC2543D | 89m | 1m | 28.1 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. Single-metre high-grade interval. | ||
| CMRC2640DW1 | 528m | 2.9m | 9.76 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2616DW1 | 459m | 7m | 3.90 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2535D | 30m | 6m | 4.43 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2555D | 630m | 11.3m | 2.36 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC3138DW1 | 373m | 1.1m | 21.6 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2548D | 19m | 4m | 5.99 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. | ||
| CMRC2592 | 41m | 5m | 4.78 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2605D | 51m | 9m | 2.65 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC2634D | 72m | 7m | 3.34 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1b (2m internal waste). | ||
| CMRC3136D | 499m | 7.6m | 3.08 g/t Au | Modest | Appendix 1. Azimuth is blank for this hole in the collar table. | ||
| CMRC2552D | 278m | 14.5m | 1.44 g/t Au | Modest | 60% | Hornet highlight in text. Appendix 1. | |
| incl. CMRC2553D | 319m | 4m | 3.57 g/t Au | Including sub-interval stated in text only (4.0m at 3.57 g/t from... | |||
| incl. CMRC2552D | 283m | 3.5m | 3.55 g/t Au | Including sub-interval stated in text only (3.5m at 3.55 g/t from... |
Checked against the PDF. Every interval above is printed in the announcement itself - each width and grade was found, together, in the PDF's own text.
- Holes reported
- 170 of 88 drilled
- Metres drilled
- 26,668
- Drilling
- Combined diamond (NQ2 core on RC pre-collars) and RC, Topdrill rigs
- Cut-off grade
- Lexington and Orion South underground: 1 g/t Au, minimum 1m. Appendix 1c open pit: 0.5 g/t Au, minimum 1m.
- Max internal dilution
- Lexington: 5.5m (text and Appendix 1). Orion South: 2m (text and Appendix 1b). Open pit (Appendix 1c): 2m.
- True widths
- Not stated - intervals are down-hole
- Hole spacing
- Hole spacing is not stated in the release. Table 1 gives RC spacing of 50m N x 50m E to 25m N x 25m E for resource work at MGGP. Lexington is extension drilling below and along strike of the reserve outline, about 600m north of Orion South. Orion South drilling is infill and extension of the principal lodes, plus a steep Western Lode position.
- Depth
- Intercepts run from about 260m to more than 840m down-hole. Vertical depths are not stated and the tables give no hole depths. The tables list collar RL and dip, so depths could be worked out, but the release does not do so. Holes_reported (about 170) is counted from the Appendix 1c list, which contains every hole in Appendices 1 and 1b.
Against the project's earlier holes
Against DrillScore's earlier intercepts (best 25, 31 Jul 2026), this release is stronger at the top end. The 6.0m at 57.38 g/t and 3.0m at 89.88 g/t exceed the highest grade in that history list (4m at 41.09 g/t), and the 7.0m at 40.01 g/t sits just below it. Width and total metal cannot be compared on the same basis because the history list uses its own cut-offs and the release does not say which holes were reported before.
Against similar explorers
The top hits are very high grade for an underground program, and the 6.0m at 57.38 g/t and 3.0m at 89.88 g/t are at the top end of what explorers usually show. Most tabled intervals sit between 1 and 5 g/t. On the rough gram-metre guide the best Lexington hits look well above 'good', but DrillScore's code will score them. A single high-grade hole is common for explorers, so the wider, repeatable intercepts matter more.
Gram-metre calculator - gram-metres explained - the leaderboard
Disclosure checks - the ASX's own focus areas
- Drill-hole table (collars, dip, azimuth, depth, every intercept)caution
- JORC Table 1, Section 1 - sampling techniques and datapass
- JORC Table 1, Section 2 - reporting of exploration resultspass
- Competent person statementpass
- No metal equivalents - grades as assayedpass
- Balanced reporting - low and high grades both shownfail
The text quotes 6 Lexington, 3 Hornet and 4 Orion South highlights. The tables list only holes with significant intercepts, with no nil holes and no hole depths. The release does not say which holes are new, so the 88 holes drilled this quarter (plus 45 at Orion South) cannot be matched to the roughly 170 holes in the tables. Low-grade and nil results are not summarised.
- No visual estimates - assays onlypass
- Down-hole widths onlycaution
Down-hole intervals can overstate how thick the mineralisation really is.
Red flags and notes
The text quotes 6 Lexington, 3 Hornet and 4 Orion South highlights. The tables list only holes with significant intercepts, with no nil holes and no hole depths. The release does not say which holes are new, so the 88 holes drilled this quarter (plus 45 at Orion South) cannot be matched to the roughly 170 holes in the tables. Low-grade and nil results are not summarised.
Some holes, collar details or nil results are missing from the drill-hole table.
Only down-hole widths are reported. Table 1 says drilling is at about 60 degrees to the west into a steep east-dipping lode, so intercepts are described as roughly perpendicular in most cases, but no true widths or conversion factors are stated.
Appendix 1c lists about 170 holes, against 88 Lexington-Hornet and 45 Orion South holes drilled in the quarter. The release does not mark which holes or intercepts are new, so earlier results may be repackaged as new.
Appendix 1 applies up to 5.5m internal waste to every hole, including Orion South holes that the text says use 2m. Appendix 1b uses 2m. The same style of result therefore gets different interval lengths depending on which table it sits in.
The text gives 32.0m at 3.25 g/t from 260m. Appendix 1 gives 41m at 2.65 g/t from 260m for the same hole. Two Hornet including intervals (4.0m at 3.57 g/t and 3.5m at 3.55 g/t) appear only in the text. The table figures are used here.
The tables have no hole depth column and do not list holes with nil results. Holes drilled (88 and 45) cannot be matched to the holes listed, so nil results cannot be checked.
Why these matter: JORC Table 1 - metal equivalents - balanced reporting - visual estimates
How the price reacted
DrillScore 73 (top 13% of drill results), and on day 1 the stock moved +0.7% against the gold index (XGD).
From the last close before the market could trade on it ($12.39 on 23 Oct 2026), with day-1 volume 1.2x the 20-day average.
CMM's past price-sensitive news
After 9 earlier announcements, CMM rose on day 1 3 times and fell 6 times - an average move of +1.1%.
DrillScore has no price reactions on record for CMM's earlier price-sensitive news. Between the release and now, the share price moved from A$12.39 to A$13.63 (about +10%). That is close to the ASX gold index move (XGD +11.3%), so the move looks more like sector-wide gold strength than a stock-specific reaction. This describes past movement only and says nothing about future prices.
Past reactions describe what happened, not what will. How prices react to results
The historical pattern
What share prices did after past results like this one, from DrillScore's own records. It describes the past: it isn't a forecast for CMM and it isn't advice.
After 5 other drill results rated 'Strong', stocks moved -0.1% by day 1, +0.1% by day 5 and -0.2% by day 20 against the XGD on average.
- Day 1
- -0.1%
- Day 5
- +0.1%
- Day 20
- -0.2%
After its earlier announcements, CMM moved +1.1% by day 1, +0.5% by day 5 and -1.9% by day 20 against the XGD on average.
- Day 1
- +1.1%
- Day 5
- +0.5%
- Day 20
- -1.9%
In the 20 trading days before this release the XGD gold index moved -12.8% (falling). After 34 past gold announcements released into a falling gold index, stocks moved +1.8% by day 1, +4.1% by day 5 and +11.4% by day 20 on average - before taking the market's own move out.
- Day 1
- +1.8%
- Day 5
- +4.1%
- Day 20
- +11.4%
A strand leans up or down when its day-5 average is 1% or more either way. Each is shown on its own and never added up into a prediction: small samples swing, and every result is different. The full backtest - how it's worked out
The market it landed in
| Market | On the day | Now | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold (US$/oz) | US$4,008 | US$3,886 | -3.0% |
| Gold (A$/oz) | A$5,709 | A$5,737 | +0.5% |
| Copper (US$/lb) | US$6.48 | US$6.09 | -6.0% |
| AUD/USD | 0.7020 | 0.6774 | -3.5% |
Gold in US dollars fell about 3% from the release (US$4,007.9/oz to US$3,886.3/oz). Gold in A$ rose 0.5% to about A$5,737/oz because the Australian dollar fell about 3.5% (US$0.702 to US$0.6774). Spot in A$ is far above the A$2,200/oz reserve price and the A$2,800/oz optimisation price cited in Figure 5, and above the A$1,648/oz June quarter AISC in DrillScore's history, so the margin at spot is wide. The release does not contain a new economic study, so this is context only. Sector mood was mixed: the ASX gold index (XGD) rose 11.3% and GDX gained 1.8%, while GDXJ eased 0.3%, copper miners (COPX) fell 5.3% and silver fell 8.5%. US yields rose 0.17 points and the US dollar index rose 1.6%, both of which weigh on gold in US dollar terms.
Against CMM's own history
DrillScore's earlier intercepts (best 25, 31 Jul 2026) peak at 15m at 14.61 g/t (219 g-m as scored) and 4m at 41.09 g/t. This release's 6.0m at 57.38 g/t and 3.0m at 89.88 g/t are higher-grade single intervals than any in that list. Cash was A$504.8m at 30 June 2026 with no debt, and the database records A$535m at 30 September 2026. No capital raising is on record, so this release carries no dilution signal. The Mt Gibson PFS (27 July 2026) shows about 260koz a year, and this drilling extends the underground base beyond it.
Risks & caveats
- Down-hole widths only. True widths are not given, so the true thickness of the lodes is not yet known.
- The best grades come from short intervals (for example 3.0m at 89.88 g/t and 6.0m at 57.38 g/t). A few metres drive much of the result.
- No resource exists yet for Lexington. The Inferred estimate depends on drill density, assay confirmation and the modelling choices still to be made.
- Deeper Hornet assays are still pending, so the Hornet picture is incomplete.
- The release mixes cut-offs and internal waste rules and does not say which holes are new, so the reader cannot compare like with like.
What's next
- Maiden Inferred underground Mineral Resource Estimate for Lexington - later this quarter (Oct to Dec 2026, Q2 FY27)
- Further assay results across the Mt Gibson deposits, including deeper Hornet drilling - Q2 FY27 (Oct to Dec 2026)
- Commissioning of the on-site core processing facility at MGGP - planned November 2026
Questions worth asking
- Which holes and intercepts in Appendices 1, 1b and 1c are new in this release, and which were reported earlier?
- Why do the internal waste limits differ between Appendix 1 (5.5m), Appendix 1b and the Orion South text (2m), and which rule will the Lexington maiden resource use?
- What are the true widths and hole spacings for the Lexington and Hornet intercepts, and how many holes in the program had nil results?
- Why does the CMRC2619D text (32.0m at 3.25 g/t from 260m) differ from the Appendix 1 table (41m at 2.65 g/t)?
- What tonnes, grade and classification (Inferred or Indicated share) will the Lexington maiden underground resource report, and when?
What it means
For someone following CMM, this release adds underground ounces to the Mt Gibson story. The best Lexington, Hornet and Orion South intercepts are high grade and sit below current reserve designs, which supports the case for more underground ore. The evidence is still early: assays only, no new resource, down-hole widths, and a set of tables that mixes cut-offs and does not say which holes are new. The next useful checkpoints are the Lexington maiden Inferred estimate and the Q2 FY27 assays. This is general information, not personal advice.
General information only - not financial advice. DrillScore's analyses are produced automatically by an AI model (Claude, by Anthropic) from the company's own ASX announcement and public market data, and scored by a fixed formula (how it works). They can be wrong or incomplete, don't consider your objectives or circumstances, and are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything. Always read the original announcement and consider advice from a licensed adviser.
Decoded 15 Nov 2026, 8:17 am by claude-haiku-5-5 - confidence: medium. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.
Start the conversation
Discuss CMM's announcement